So there is a lot going on in the world today and I’m working on many posts that will vent my spleen and share my thoughts with the interwebs. In the mean time, I thought it would be nice to take a step back and watch another fun video from CGP Grey.

As I’ve already suggested, we need to eliminate DST and reduce time zones.  And I still think that if we cannot move Halloween to September, we should at least bump it up a couple of weeks in October.

Enjoy.

Free Fun Friday is where I like to feature a video that has gone viral or is otherwise interesting. It started as a way to make a quick blog entry so that I wouldn’t go too long between post for my readers. Now it’s sort of evolved as a way to stretch my writing muscles and flex my creativity neural pathways.
___

Thank you for reading and I hope you will comment below. Please also do any and all of the following — I know pushy right!

  • “Like” and “Share” this post using those buttons under the headline.
  • follow me on Twitter
  • see some mildly amusing photos and posts on my Facebook Fan Page.
  • Subscribe by email below.

images

Type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.

Catholic, Current Events, Religion

Catholic Bishops veto of gay-friendly Synod not a loss for Pope Francis

Source:  Flickr Creative Commons/Mazur/catholicnews.org.uk

Source: Flickr Creative Commons/Mazur/catholicnews.org.uk

 

Conservative bishops in the Roman Catholic church voted against language that had been “hailed as a historic warming of attitudes towards gay people”  according to  The Guardian.

In the final report of an extraordinary synod on the family which has exposed deep divides in the church hierarchy, there is no mention – as there had been in a draft version – of the “gifts and qualities” gay people can offer. Nor is there any recognition of the “precious support” same-sex partners can give each other.

A paragraph entitled “pastoral attention to people of homosexual orientation” – itself a distinctly cooler tone than “welcoming homosexual persons” – refers to church teaching, saying there can be “not even a remote” comparison between gay unions and heterosexual marriage.

“Nevertheless,” it adds, “men and women of homosexual tendencies must be welcomed with respect and sensitivity.” They should not suffer from discrimination, it adds. But the shift in tone is clear. And, in a potentially stark sign of the discomfort provoked among many bishop, even this watered-down passage failed to pass the two-thirds majority needed for it to be approved. —  The Guardian.

 

Here are some of my thoughts.

  1. Better to do nothing than release something half-baked or watered down.  And I mean that both ways.  If the Church decides to go all in and not support “The Gays” then by all means don’t try to sugar coat it with ambiguous lukewarm statements and double speak.
  2.  This is the first extraordinary Synod in almost three decades.  While we don’t know how the individual bishops voted, we do know the count.  This is because Pope Francis wanted the process to be as transparent as possible while still maintaining the confidentiality of individual bishop votes.  Encouraging the bishops to speak their minds Pope Francis has embraced a radically more collegiate style of church governance than has been seen for decades.  The man definitely practices what he preaches.
  3.  It is possible the veto occurred because some progressive bishops wanted to preserve the original suggested language.  This sounds like wishful thinking but it isn’t unprecedented.  Back in the early 2000s a conservative group lobbied against an anti-abortion bill because it wasn’t restrictive enough in their eyes.
  4. Pope Francis: classy as ever.  Not showing any disappointment at the outcome of the vote, He said “Personally I would have been very worried and saddened if there hadn’t been these … animated discussions … if everyone had agreed with one another or had kept silent in a false and acquiescent peace,” The Guardian.
  5. Don’t forget the Divorced and Remarried.  One of the other items on the plate was Catholics who have divorced and remarried should be allowed to take holy communion.   – that issue also failed to gather the necessary two-thirds majority.

So is this a loss for Pope Francis?  Not by a long shot. Ever since his election last March, The Pope has time and again made clear his belief that the church needs to shift its focus, become more inclusive, and develop a better understanding of people’s lives in modern times in order to survive, let alone thrive.  By calling this synod and implementing its level of transparency, the Pope is forcing the issue sooner than later of what direction the Church wants to go.  Does it continue to live in the past or does it get with the program and adapt to modern times.

****************
Thank you for reading and I hope you will comment below. Here’s the part where I beg for stuff because we get paid in likes, shares, re-tweets and feedback. Please also do any and all of the following:

Follow Mysteries of Life on Twitter (@MysteriesOLife), Facebook or subscribe via email.

Type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.

Standard
Blogapalooza, Life Lessons, Pop Culture

Call people by their chosen name or know that you are being a jerk

what is in a name

I have one of those names (Michael) that people like to truncate (Mike) or kidify (Mikey) or even use a far out nickname (Mickey).  Like many Arthurs, Charles and Peters, I took a stand after college and declared that I would only answer to ‘Michael.”  This didn’t go well with 1) older people  2) my friends who were use to calling me Mike and 3) obnoxious asshats.

When it comes to what people call you, you basically get two Camps.  In the  First Camp are the people who ask you what you want to be called or pay attention when you introduce yourself.  These people are naturally smart and sexy.  In the second Camp, are people who:

hear Thomas and think Tom;
hear Peter and  think Pete;
hear Kimberly and think Kim etc.

and substitute the short version for the long name.  These people really need to be eliminated from the gene pool.

This Straight Dope forum post illustrates the many pitfalls quite well:

My name is Elizabeth. I don’t like to be called “Liz.” At all….I really do not like being called Liz. I have my reasons. Sucking it up and letting people call me Liz is not an option.* …I’ve never figured out a way to ask people not to call me Liz without offending them. Nobody likes to be corrected, of course, but for some reason, I’ve never been able to do this diplomatically.

The thing that prompted me to start a thread about it, though, was from a work email that I received today.*** It’s from someone in accounting that I’ve never met face-to-face, but with whom I’ve dealt before and will continue to do so in the future. If I was never going to deal with her again, I’d just let it go. But I will have to deal with her again, and I have no idea how to tell her to call me Elizabeth without sounding snippy.

***Why the hell do people just decide that I should be called Liz? I signed my email “Elizabeth.” I have a sig with my contact information that has my name as Elizabeth. Isn’t it completely obvious that my name is Elizabeth?? The woman in question’s name is Joeanne. With an extra “e” in the middle. I’m tempted to call her “Joe!” And how much you wanna bet that she gets pissed off if people call her Joanne or Jo-ann or whatever?

We get it.  You were taught at a young age that certain names are synonymous with their nicknames or you couldn’t pronounce Aunt Barbara so you were allowed to say Barb.  And now it is second nature and no one likes to be corrected or made to feel bad.

By the way, it can work both ways. There are people who want to be called by a nickname because they have a name that might be hard to pronounce and just gets butchered by American tongues, or is too formal or just because. I know a lot of Ursulas who only go by Ula.  And I know Kates who hate being called Katie.

whats in a nameI got one of my friends to change her tune with the following argument:

Me: I prefer to go by Michael now. Mike just doesn’t cut it.
Her: Nope, I cannot do it. You have always been Mike, that’s just the way it is.
Me: There was a time when we didn’t let women vote. That was the way it just was until someone said “hey, let’s try something here.”
Her: I hate you Michael.

Of course it doesn’t help to have goofballs like this guy writing articles with very little beyond empirical evidence that nicknames name you rich.

My advice:

  1. Ask someone what they want to be called, i.e. do you go by Elizabeth or Liz?
  2. Pay attention to how they introduce themselves or sign their messages.
  3. Pay particular attention when someone else introduces them.  If someone says “this is Alex” and they cringe, it’s a good chance they prefer Alexis.
  4. Call them what they want to be called.
  5. Repeat Step 4 always and forever.

I cannot stress this enough. when someone introduces me as “Mike” i immediately say “Michael” but some people don’t get this.

if someone specifically asks you to call them “Michael” instead of “Mike”. That’s it. Game over. You don’t get to use excuses like “but all the Michaels’ I know go by Mike.”  That’s like saying all the blondes I know are sluts so why won’t you sleep with me!

If you have been told explicitly by someone to call them a preferred name and you still insist on calling them your own curtailed truncated version of that name, know that you are offending them.

Each week ChicagoNow bloggers, such as myself, are given a theme from which we can write a blog post interpreting the topic in any way that we want. It’s called “This Blogger’s Life”. This week’s theme is titled “What’s in a name?”  I’m surprised none of the other more talented bloggers beat me to this one.

****************
Thank you for reading and I hope you will comment below. Here’s the part where I beg for stuff because we get paid in likes, shares, re-tweets and feedback. Please also do any and all of the following:

Follow Mysteries of Life on Twitter (@MysteriesOLife), Facebook or subscribe via email.

 

Standard

When I made a profile in the year two thousand something, Social Media wasn’t a thing and networking was regulated to collecting business cards at job fairs and alumni events. For the electronic/online version, you basically had Plaxo and I’m not sure what else. The one reason I joined LinkedIn was because I am awful at describing what I do for a living and thus terrible at putting a resume together.  so i figured I would simply find other Widget Makers and copy their resume descriptions because that is one of the few times it’s okay to plagiarize.

 

[placegallery]

****************
Thank you for reading and I hope you will comment below. Here’s the part where I beg for stuff because we get paid in likes, shares, re-tweets and feedback. Please also do any and all of the following:

Follow Mysteries of Life on Twitter (@MysteriesOLife), Facebook or subscribe via email.

Type your email address in the box and click the “create subscription” button. My list is completely spam free, and you can opt out at any time.

****************

Corporate America, Life Lessons

7 things I hate about LinkedIn

Gallery